Torah, Deuteronomy 13:1-6, false prophet Paul, adding to Torah, subtracing from Torah

Posted on 22/04/2011 by admin

The Creator doesn’t change – Malachi 3:6.

The new formal pact in Yirmeyahu [Jeremiah] 31 is also based on Torah-observance. It is made with Am Yisraeil [people of Israel] and not with Christians.

Anyone teaching against Torah is a false prophet according to D’varim – Deuteronomy – 13:1-6 in Hebrew according to etymology.

If you want to learn about the historical Rabbi called Y’hoshua – the Jewish Mashiakh [‘Messiah’] – I recommend you to study at www.netzarim.co.il

Pauls added to Torah and subtracted from Torah. According to Torah, anyone doing this is a false prophet. Conclusion?

Anders Branderud

 

Posted in Paul vs Torah | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Genesis 15:6 vs false prophet Paul and Romans 4- Abraham righteousness vs Christian salvation

Posted on 22/04/2011 by admin

Vince quoted Gen. 15:6.

Here follows my reply:

“So [Avrâm] trusted in ha-Sheim; and He counted it to him a tzәdâqâh (righteousness as definied by Torah) .[Bereshit (Genesus) 15:6]
Of course trusting in ha-Sheim is an act of tzәdâqâh! There’s no surprise, nor great revelation, in that!

Notice that Avrâm trusted in ha-Sheim, not a Hellenist substitute for ha-Sheim – which is idolatry, violating D’vârim [Deuteronomy] 13.1-6. This, by itself, exposes the falseness in, and absolutely disproves, the Christian claim.

This wouldn’t even be a valid argument for the first century Ribi [title similar to Rabbi] Yәhoshua ha-Mashiakh – the Jewish Messiah, much less the misojudaic post-135 C.E. Christian (i.e., Hellenist) J*esus. As a teacher of Torâh, Ribi Y’hoshua instructed his followers to trust in ha-Sheim – like Avrâm!!!

Further, tzәdâqâh doesn’t mean “an overall state of righteousness” as portrayed by Christianity. (…)

This Hellenist corruption occurred in the Hellenist (Greek) translation of the LXX, in which this Hebrew term is rendered with the Greek concept of δικαιοσυνη (dikaiosunæ).

The Hellenist rendering allowed for Hellenizing the concept, extending the meaning to “rightwiseness” and “right” – “the context of which shews that ‘the righteousness of G*od’ means essentially the same as His faithfulness… that which is consistent with His own nature and promises” (Vine’s Expository Dictionary) – which Vine’s then goes on to remold and evolve the meaning of dikaiosunæ to fit Christian doctrines by citing the assumed authority of the NT.

Don’t assume false prophet Paul and NT to be true

Since the NT isn’t admissible as authority until someone can logically demonstrate from Torâh the validity of the NT, subsequent arguments based on assuming the validity of the NT are logically non-admissible and, therefore, irrelevant.

Thus, the whole assumption that this pâsuq [verse] is the basis of “salvation” being by “faith” alone in J*esus is predicated entirely on post-135 C.E. idolatrous Hellenism.

Nor is there even any basis outside of post-135 C.E. idolatrous Hellenism for the Hellenist concept of personal spiritual “salvation.” In Torâh, ישועה never refers to a personal spiritual ‘salvation’ as espoused in Christianity.

What Torah teaches about righteousness vs false prophet Paul about righteousness.

An act of tz’dâqâh does not equate to any overall state of “righteousness,” nor “atonement,” nor personal spiritual “salvation.” The Torâh requirement for eternal life is kipur [blotting out of Torah-transgressions] (see commentary at bә-Midbar 29.7), which is conditional on doing one’s utmost to keep Torâh.

Furthermore, nothing is more sanctimonious and hypocritical than claiming that “faith” implies that one may freely violate the Torâh that Ribi Y’hoshua taught and live the exact opposite of how Ribi Yәhoshua ha-Mashiakh (the Messiah) and his Nәtzârim followers lived and what they taught. In their willful choice to routinely transgress Torâh, every Christian continually testifies that J*esus is their instrument of sin (viz., transgression of Torâh), their minister of sin.

The Christian claim taught by Paul – the false prophet, based on following a 4th century Hellenist counterfeit, is not only false; it is blasphemous and idolatrous.

[Adapted quote from: http://www.netzarim.co.il ;History Museum; “Birth of Christianity” ]

I hope that you all will start doing your utmost to keep the directives of Torah just like the Creator commands you to. Only this will according to Torah lead you into an immensely meaningful relationsship with the Creator.

Anders Branderud

Posted in prophet | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Prophet Yeshua. Paul false prophet? Jesus, false prophet?

Posted on 19/04/2011 by admin

My reply to the signature Bring Freedom,

Hello!

I will quote you below and give me comments after your statements:

Torah vs Paul – false prophet?

You wrote:

“Paul is gentile of Apostle”

If he is a prophet of the Torah can only be determined by comparing him to the specifications of Torah- D’varim [Deuteronomy] 13:1-6. Did Paul add to Torah and did he subtract from Torah.

It is important to note this: According to the prophecy in Isaiah 9:6 in Hebrew according to the Hebrew numbering (which differs from the Christian), the Messiah would teach his followers to observe the directives of the Torah – the books of Moses. The word ‘mishpat’ is used, which implies non-selective observance of the directives of the Torah to a person’s utmost.

Torah and salvation vs Paul – false prophet?

So this is what the Mashiakh – Messiah – must have taught about ‘salvation’:


As stipulated in Devarim ["Deuteronomy"] 6:4-9,11:13-21 one is required to keep all of the directives of Torâh′ to one’s utmost—viz., “with all one’s heart, psyche and might [lit. "very"]“—”for the purpose of extending your days and the days of your children… like the days of the heavens above the earth” (i.e., eternal life). According to the Tan’’kh -Yekhezeqeil ["Ezekiel"] chapter 18 et.al – the Creator confer His atonement in His loving kindness to those and only those turning away from their Torah-transgressions and (re)turning to non-selectively Torah-observance including mishpat.
[Further documentation: Link]

 

That is, contradictory to what is traditionally assumed persons rejecting the Torah will not be forgiven by the Creator in His loving kindness.

 

However, this is not a problem for the person loving the Creator and wanting to do His Will. He/she will (re)turn into non-selective observance of the directives of the Torah, which includes an immensely meaningful relationship with the Creator.

Paul taught Romans 10:9 which contradicts Torah.

You wrote: “our Lord Yeshua HaMashiach has choise him”

If you are referring to the Rabbi called Y’hoshua – the Jewish Mashiakh – then it is a fact that he did teach Torah; and that his followers the Netzarim did teach Torah. See documentation on the website of http://www.netzarim.co.il/ [History Museum]. He was a human and not an incarnate man-god/divine saviour/divine Son of God/’divine Lord’.

No he was a spiritual son of the Creator, just like the Jews according to Tana’’kh are spiritual sons of the Creator.

Rabbi Yeshua and Torah vs Paul – false prophet?

 

You wrote: “Paul was many good deed of Good News and proclaim our lord’s name “Yeshua”

As demonstrated above Paul didn’t teach about the historical Rabbi called Y’hoshua. Paul taught about the Christian Ieisous: Documentation

He distorted whom the historical Rabbi Y’hoshua was and taught a message in contradiction to Rabbi Y’hoshua’s Torah-teachings. The historical Rabbi Y’hoshua is not the same as the distortion Jesus.

 

You wrote: “Apostle Paul sending letters Romans, Corinthians , Galatians, Ephesians ,Philippians, Colossians , Thessalonians ,Timothy  Titus, Philemon, Hebrews “

There are no proofs that he wrote the original version that was redacted to the Hebrew. Did you know that the NT has been heavily redacted: Documentation

You wrote: “this letters very spiritual and we received good of God’s word”

What is spiritual is defined by Torah.

Quote: “Torah commands (wa-Yiqra 10:10) — lә-Havdil — between Qodesh and khol. To suggest that a Spirit of Holiness could dwell in a willfully unholy physical body, much less be the Motivator causing one to wilfully choose an unholy physical body, not only contradicts Torah and invalidates the antinomian J*esus (exposing antinomian J*esus, being anti-Torah, as a servant of Satan), but misattributes unholy works — which are works of Satan — to the Holy Spirit; described by Ribi Yehoshua as blasphemy of the Holy Spirit (NHM 12.22-32)!

Many ask “How can so many people be wrong?” Yet, the teaching of Ribi Yehoshua is (NHM 7.13-14): “Come in through Sha·ar ha-Tzar (“Difficult Gate”) because Sha·ar ha-Avadon (“Destruction Gate”) is wide, its way is spacious and many are going through it. How tzar (difficult) is the sha·ar (gate), and kaveid (heavy) is the Way, that leads straight to life. Few find it.” More apt questions would be “Why don’t Christians follow the Sha·ar ha-Tzar of the original teachings of Ribi Yehoshua instead of a Hellenized pagan counterfeit?” And “How can millions of Jews — which included Ribi Yehoshua — who know Torah intimately — be wrong?” And “How can gentiles who know nothing about Torah, can’t read the first word of it, and changed everything according to the prophecy in Danieil 7.25, be right?”

The True Ruakh ha-Qodesh, as a Spirit of Holiness (not profaning), leads people toward, not away from, holiness as defined in Torah — i.e., keeping the Torah — so declares Dәvarim 13:5! In a word: Judaism!!!

Any spirit that leads astray from Torah is defined by Torah — upon which Christianity’s claims supposedly rest — as unholy, i.e., demonic.”

Once again, learn more here: http://www.netzarim.co.il/

All the best,

Anders Branderud

Posted in Paul vs Torah | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Paul false prophet, an apostate Hellenist ‘Jew’ taught Christianity

Posted on 15/04/2011 by admin

Most Christians (and Jews) believe that the followers of Rib′i Yәho•shu′a were originally called “Christians,” based on Acts 11.19-26. As the reader will see (below), the Church has worked very hard to gloss over this misrepresentation. With only two exceptions, Christian translators have interpreted “Nazareth” for every substantiation of the Judaic name by which Rib′iYәho•shu′a and his original Pharisee Jewish followers were known… and Helllenized even those two instances to “Nazarene.” In contrast to Rib′i Yәho•shu′a and his original Pharisee Jewish followers—who were Yәhud•im′ Pәrush•im′ living and teachingTor•âh′, Christians were Hellenist followers of the apostate Hellenist Turkish-Jew, Paul—in Hellenist Turkey. As followers of an excised apostate, the original Christians had no connection or roots whatsoever to Rib′i Yәho•shu′a and his original Pharisee Jewish followers… or to legitimate Judaism in Yәru•shâ•la′yim.

The situation was opposite in Syrian Antioch, “(now Antakya, Turkey), founded by Seleucus I Nicator (B.C.E. 300) and named for his father Antiochus… Antioch had an important Jewish community.

When the deterioration of the Seleucid dynasty led to the Roman occupation of Syria (B.C.E. 64), Antioch became the capital of the new province of Syria… As a prosperous commercial center Antioch was a meeting point of the Greek and the oriental civilizations. When persecution broke out in [Yәru•shâ•la′yim] following the death of Stephan, many of [his min] fled to Antioch. Some of these undertook the customary preaching to the [Hellenist] Jews in the city. Others who were “Hellenist” (Greek-speaking) Jews, finding themselves in a Greek city, began to preach to the Greek-speaking Gentiles (Acts 11.19-21), some of whom had been attending the synagogue services, attracted by the Jewish ethical teaching; one of these may have been Nicolaus of Antioch, an early proselyte and one of the seven [deacons from Yәru•shâ•la′yim] (Acts 6.5).

Paul, false prophet and Barnabas

Following the success of the first preachers, Barnabas and Paul began to work in Antioch, and it was here that the name Christians was first used (Acts 11.22-26), the term apparently having been adopted by the [Greek-speaking Hellenist] Roman authorities as a means of describing the group. We hear of an ekklesia [Greek, not Aramaic, term]…” (Geoffrey W. Bromiley, International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: A-D, Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publ., 1979 p. 142-3)

It is clear from the above that the primary language used by Paul and these original Hellenist churches in Turkey was Greek, not Aramaic and certainly not Hebrew.

This is confirmed in the Pәshitәtâ′ where the text states that those in the Hellenist Diaspora city of Antakya, Turkey, who were preaching the NT teachings of theapostate Hellenist Turkish-Jew, Paul were called, in Aramaic, “Christiane“—conspicuously not the Aramaic מְשִׁיחִי used in Jewish circles. Rather, this was a transliteration of the Hellenist Greek Χριστιανος (Khristianos). These were Hellenist Christians, of Hellenist Turkey, followers of apostate Hellenist Turkish-Jew, Paul—who had been excised for his Hellenist—Reform—syncretizing (assimilation) by the original Pharisee Jewish followers of Rib′i Yәho•shu′a!!!

[Quote from Netzarim's website]

I recommend you to read this article if you want to follow the historical Ribi called Y’hoshua – the Jewish Mashiakh: Link

Posted in Torah vs Paul | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Paul – false apostle?

Posted on 05/04/2011 by admin

I recommend you all to read this article ‘Archeological Discovery Announced to Public: Biggest in history?’ [2011-03-30] about the books you referred to. [Link]

When it comes to the letters of Paul:
“The earliest extant complete source texts of what the Christians call their “New Testament” are the Greek—Hellenized—codices א and β of the 4th-century. All historians, including Christian scholars, agree that there was no “New Testament” during the lifetime of Rib′i Y’ho•shu′a ha-Mashiakh – the Messiah – his original eyewitness followers, or even his Nәtzâr•im′.”

The most authoritative Christian scholars, e.g., The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, acknowledges:

“”It is equally true that many of them do have theological significance and were introduced into the text intentionally… Many thousands of the variants which are found in the MSS of the NT were put there deliberately. They are not merely the result of error or careless handling of the text. Many werecreated for theological or dogmatic reasons—even though they may not affect the substance of Christian dogma. [Thanks for reminding us that Christians made Christian redactions compatible with Christian dogma; ybd]). It is because the books of the NT are religious books, sacred books, canonical books, that they were changed to conform to what the copyist believed to be the true reading. His interest was not in the ‘original reading’ but in the ‘true reading’”

(ibid.)—as perceived by the Roman Christian redactors, of course. (Emphasis added and quoted from Who Are the Netzarim? (WAN))“ [Quote]

There is plenty of evidence that Ribi Y’hoshua of Nazareth taught a message antithetical to the message of Paul and the “gospels”: Documentation: Link and and the logical implications of the facts in this link

Paul, ‘gospels’, NT vs Ribi Y’hoshua of Natzrat and Netzarim

The above proves that neither Paul nor the other books of the NT can be used as evidence of what the first century Ribi Y’hoshua of Nazareth and his followers called the Netzarim taught. Yes, they were called Netzarim and not Christians [Documentation: www.netzarim.co.il [History Museum (left menu)]

Kind regards,
Anders Branderud

Posted in Torah vs NT | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Torah vs Paul; prophet or adding to Torah?

Posted on 25/03/2011 by admin

I will quote some verses from the Torah and write about Paul and his teachings.

I will quote D’varim – ‘Deuteronomy’ – 13-1-6″.

Some word explanations:
Sh’ma – hearken

D’varim – Sayings

m’taueh : command you as a mitzwah [directive or miltary style order]

davar – saying

pasuq- verse

parashah – weekly Torah-portion

A pivotal, but too-little-known, pâ•suq′ is found in this week’s pâ•râsh•âh′ (13.2-5). This passage begins with the word כי (ki; for, because or that). This indicates that 2-5 is written BECAUSE of 13.1—its preface and context. When we include the preface, as we logically should, the passage reads, “The entirety of the dâ•vâr′ that I m’tzauëh you, you are to be sho•meir′ to do it. Don’t add to it and don’t diminish from it, BECAUSE [i.e., it's inevitably that periodically] there shall arise among you a Nâ•vi′ or a dreamer-interpreter and give you a sign or wonder. When the sign or wonder that he predicted happens, and he tells you, ‘Let’s go follow another ëloh•im′ that isn’t the One you know, to work for him,’ then you shall not Sh’m•a′ to the D’vâr•im′ of that Nâ•vi′ or that dreamer-interpreter , BECAUSE י–ה your Ël•oh•im′ is giving you a test-trial to know whether you have love for י–ה your Ël•oh•im′ with all of your Leivâv and with all of your nëph′ësh—or whether you trust, instead, a human worker of apparent miracles.

“You shall follow י–ה your Ël•oh•im′. It is Him you shall revere, His mi•tzәw•ot′ you shall sho•meir′, it is to His Voice you shall Shәm•a′, Him you shall work for, and to Him that you shall adhere.”

As it is demonstrated on other posts of this blog, Paul both added directives to Torah and subtracted directives to Torah. Therefore he is a false prophet.

Posted in adding, Paul vs Torah | Leave a comment

Paul – founder of Christianity? Follower of Yeshua or false prophet?

Posted on 24/03/2011 by admin

[Click on the linked Hebrew words below in order to get a translation.]

Some explanations of words that will be used:

Netzarim: The followers of the first century Ribi Yehoshua ha-Mashiach – the Jewish Messiah – of Nazareth.

Paqid: The leader of the Netzarim had the title ‘Paqid’ (overseer).

Paqid Ya’aqov ha-Tzadiq – the brother of Ribi Yehoshua and the first leader of the Netzarim.

Kohein ha-Resha: ‘evil priest’

Kareit – cut off. To be cut off from the b’rit – pact – that the Hebrew Bible defined Israel has with the Creator.

Ma’avar:

“Nәtzâr•im′ Reconstruction of Transition. Ma•a•vâr′ is a more accurate title for the NT book de-Judaized to “Acts.” Ma•a•vâr′ records the transition of the Nәtzâr•im′ from the personal supervision of historical Rib′i Yәho•shu′a to the operation of the Beit Din ha-Nәtzâr•im′ under the first Nәtzâr•im′ Pâ•qid′, Pâ•qid′ Ya•a•qov′ “ha-Tza•diq′“ (the brother of Rib′i Yәho•shu′a) in the Ru′akh ha-Qo′dësh – Spirit of Holiness.”

If there is anything that you don’t understand, then feel free to leave a comment.

“Circa 36 C.E., “Shâ•ul′” was in Yәru•shâ•lay′im – Jerusalem - where, as a loyal Hellenist Roman citizen, he had been persecuting the Nәtzâr•im′. As he was leaving Yәru•shâ•lay′im on his return to Damascus, Syria, he was met by a prototype of Justin, who gave him a Hellenist “vision” of “Jesus” that was compatible with his Roman citizenship and inspired anew his Hellenist “enlightenment” (Ma•a•vâr′ 26.12ff). There is good reason to wonder, given the description inMa•a•vâr′ 26.15ff, which Yәho•shu′a inspired Paul’s Hellenism, Rib′i Yәho•shu′a ha-Mashiach – the Messiah – Bën- Dâ•wid′, as claimed by Christians, the more likely rabid Hellenist paradigm, Yәho•shu′a Bën-Shim•on′ (II) Bën-Tzâ•doq′— who was certainly the champion of Hellenism among the Hellenist pseudo-Tzәdoq•im′ Ko•han•ei′ hâ-Rësh′a or, even more likely, a hybrid image of the two that formed in Paul’s mind and developed into the 4th-century Christian idol.

This prototype of Justin who met with Paul on the road to Damascus was almost certainly the Ko•hein′ hâ-Rësh′a—the same Sâ•tân′ (or his successor) who offered the same deal to Rib′i Yәho•shu′a (The Nәtzâr•im′Reconstruction of Hebrew Ma•tit•yâh′u (NHM) 4.8-11). However, whereas Rib′i Yәho•shu′a refused the deal, Paul, offered the same “vision” on the road to Damascus, Syria, accepted it and the rest is history.

Before his “first mission” (to Cyprus) in 45 C.E., Paul’s intractable insistence on his Hellenist “vision” eventually resulted in a breach and his kâ•reit′, being expunged from the Yu•khas•in′ (not merely the Nәtzâr•im′), as documented by Eusebius (EH III.xxvii.4), described with typical Judaic elegance in the NT (Ma•a•vâr′ 15.38) as “having been ‘delivered over to khën (graciousness) of י--ה [the Creator] by the brothers” (see notes in Appendix IV, Transition 15,Atonement In the Biblical ‘New Covenant’ (ABNC)).

Until his kâ•reit′, the point noted in Ma•a•vâr′ 13.9 (and described in Ma•a•vâr′ 15.38), he is referred to as Shâ•ul′, while in Ma•a•vâr′ 13.9 he is last called by his Hebrew name, Shâ•ul′, and first called by his Hellenist name, Paul—the apostate never again (except by himself in his own letters) referred to as Shâ•ul′.

Christian beliefs about Paul’s “martyrdom” range from execution by Romans for practicing Judaism (“proving” Paul’s Christianity was Judaism) to murder by Jews for being a Christian. Both are driven by a need to corroborate Christianity rather than historical fact. It’s no accident that Paul, a rabidly Hellenist Jew, was executed, in Rome, between 66-68 C.E. This is precisely the time that the Hellenist pseudo-Tzәdoq•im′, with whom Paul was intimately and inextricably tied, declared war on Rome (see Hellenist pseudo-Tzәdoq•im′). Paul was killed by the Romans at this time because he was a Hellenist Jew, no different in any significant respect from the Hellenist pseudo-Tzәdoq•im′ inYәru•shâ•lay′im who had declared war on them. Paul’s execution by the Romans had no more to do with his proto-Christian theology than the Roman killings of other Hellenist Jews, who had no connection to his theology, during this period as tensions mounted toward the destruction of Yәru•shâ•lay′im and the Beit ha-Mi•qәdâsh′ ha-Shein•i′ – second ‘temple’ - in 70 C.E. Because it was the Hellenist pseudo-Tzәdoq•im′ who had attacked the Roman occupiers in Yәru•shâ•lay′im, the Romans focused their retaliation particularly on Hellenist Jews, like Paul; for a short time leaving non-Hellenist Jews outside of Yәhud•âh′ in relative, though fearful, oppressed and short-lived, “peace.”  [Source]

Posted in Torah vs Acts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Paul or Saul – A Hellenist ‘Jew’

Posted on 24/03/2011 by admin

Paul ; (b. ca. 3 C.E., d. ca. 67 C.E.) שָׁאוּל (Shâ•ul′; questioned, asked or, by extension, borrowed)

“A Hellenist Turk Jew (from Tarsus, Turkey), Shâ•ul′ was, by his own testimony, raised in the tradition of Beit-Sham•ai′ (Ma•a•vâr′ 26.5), which predominated the Beit-Din ha-Jâ•dol′ until 20 C.E. Jerome alleged, probably to create a fictional proximity to Rib′i Yәho•shu′a, that his family was originally from the Gâ•lil′.

Shâ•ul′ later studied in Yәru•shâ•lay′im under Nâ•si′ Rib′i Ja•mәl•iy•eil′—who taught the less-strict tradition of Beit-Hi•leil′ and, presumably, reoriented Shâ•ul′ to its less-strict interpretations. Apparently rebelling against the strict teachings of his upbringing, Shâ•ul′ found this an intellectually liberating enlightenment, which prepared him for his eventual “vision” that would manifest itself in his extreme swing from the strictness of his upbringing to an obsessive “vision” of Hellenism and assimilation in the tradition of Yәho•shu′a Bën-Shim•on′ (II) Bën-Tzâ•doq′.

Paul’s rabid obsession with Hellenism is evidenced:

  1. by his submission to the Hellenist pseudo-Tzәdoq•im′ Ko•han•ei′ hâ-Rësh′a (successor, in every respect, to Yәho•shu′a Bën-Shim•on′ (II) Bën-Tzâ•doq′) in their cooperative persecution of non-Hellenist, Pәrush•im′-heritage (Orthodox), Jews (Ma•a•vâr′ 26.10). This effort was aimed specifically at those whom the Hellenist pseudo-Tzәdoq•im′ Ko•han•ei′ hâ-Rësh′a regarded the most threatening. Proof of this includes their instigation of the execution of Rib′i Yәho•shu′a, their murder of Ya•a•qov′ Bën-Za•vәd•i•eil′ (Ma•a•vâr′ 12:1-3) and their murder of Pâ•qid′ Ya•a•qov′ “ha-Tza•diq′“ (Josephus xx.ix.1).
  2. by his intimacy with the Hellenist pseudo-Tzәdoq•im′ (as evidenced by the incumbent Ko•hein′ hâ-Rësh′a, whom he cites as a personal reference in Ma•a•vâr′ 22.5).
  3. by his own acknowledgement that his followers were congregations in Turkey of apostate and kâ•reit′ “Hellenist Jews” (cf. note 15.1.2-1 to note 15.1.2 in Appendix IV of Atonement In the Biblical ‘New Covenant’ Live-Link (ABNC Live-Link)).” [Source]
Posted in Christian History | Leave a comment

Torah and good works vs. Paul and his law

Posted on 24/03/2011 by admin
Good works is definied by Torah – D’varim [Deuteronomy] 6:4-9. If you want to serve the Creator, then you must do  your utmost to keep His directives – including celebrating Shabbat, not eating shellfish, not eating pork and many more directives. This will also necessitate studying the links that I have provided, which helps you to observe the directives of the Torah…

If you want to create a movie, which should honor the Creator, you must first learn about His Will in Torah.

As Ribi Yehoshua – the Messiah – of Nazareth put it:
Netzarim Reconstruction of Hebrew Matityahu 6:32f:

Therefore, don’t worry saying, ‘What will we eat?,’ ‘What will we drink?,’ or ‘In what will we be dressed?’; 32 for these are all things the body 6.32.1 seeks.6.32.2 Your Father of the heavens 3.2.2sees that you need all these things. 33 Request7.1.1 first the Realm 6.33.1 and His tzәdâq•âh′ [i.e. righteousness as it is defined by Torah] and all these things shall be given to you.6.33.2 34 So don’t worry about tomorrow.6.34.1 Tomorrow will be worrisome enough on its own. One day’s evil 21.41.1 is enough.

I hope this helps!

Posted in Torah vs NT | Leave a comment

Paul – a false prophet?

Posted on 24/03/2011 by admin

Shalom to you,

Thanks for asking such an important question! The words of all men
should be compared to Torah to see if the words are valid or not. I am
glad that you seem to be striving towards finding the truth!!

I write this reply only to be helpful and hope!

The first century Torah-teacher Rabbi Yeshua ha-Mashiach of Nazareth
taught this [Netzarim Reconstruction of Hebrew Matityahu]:

“Ribi Yeho•shu′ a said to him, “Why do you ask me about ‘good?’ One
[referring to ha-Sheim] is Good. If you wish to come into life, keep
shomeir (watchguard, over the) mitzvot.”

In the below text I will use the word mishpat. Explanation of this word: Link
Kheit = transgression of Torah.

Yeshayâhu [’Isaiah’] 1.17-18: ‘Wash up, clear yourself.… Learn [what
is] good, seek mishpat.… Prithee come, let us reprove,’ says HaSheim,
‘If your kheit are like scarlet they shall be whitened like snow.’”

D’varim ['Deuteronomy'] 6:4-9, 11:13f, chapter 26 and onwards,
wa-Yiqra ['Leviticus'] 5:14-20 [nephesh - speaking of every
individual, not only the nephesh of a Jew], Yekhezeqeil ['Ezekiel']
chapter 18 and many more verses in Hebrew outlines what the Creator
requires of us in order for us to receive His forgiveness, which is
necessary to enter into ha olam haba – Realm of the Heavens. No man
including the Messiah has the authority to change what the Creator has
outlined in His Torah – see D’varim 4:2 and 13:1-6.

Clearly, seeking mishpat is required in order to be forgiven by the
Creator according to the above verses

According to the above and many more verses of the Tana”ch, the
Creator does not confer His atonement to persons whom wilfully reject
any directive of the Torah, e.g. a person who eats pork or shellfish.
This is according to Torah true for all of mankind, not just the Jews.

According to Torah we need to do our utmost to keep mishpat.  This is
not what Paul taught.

Paul taught that which is written in Rom 10:9. However this isn’t
found in the Torah, and actually is prohibited by Torah. We are
forbidden to subtract from Torah and add to Torah which Paul did in
many, many verses of the book of Romans.

Pauls teaching about the lifestyle one is required to live in order to
enter the Realms of Heavens contradicts what the Torah teaches about
entering into the Realm of the Heavens.

Furthermore, Paul didn’t teach about the historical Ribi Yehoshua, but
about his Hellenist redacted version ‘Ieisous’. Read more in
www.netzarim.co.il [History Museum (left menu)].

There is no evidence that it wasn’t Paul who taught those words found
in the book of Romans; and those words are anti-Torah also in the most
extant Greek manuscripts. One must also note that the “NT” has been
heavily redacted [Documentation: Link]. More arguments showing that
Paul taught against the Torah: Link.

It is possible to be forgiven by the Creator in His loving kindness
when one does his/her utmost to live as the Creator desires as
stipulated in His Torah including mishpat! This is great news!!
Observing the Will of the Creator, including a relationship with Him,
is immensely meaningful; and I highly recommend that.

Paul quoted the Greek LXX ['Septuaginte']; and Paul’s interpretations
of verses in Tana”kh differs greatly towards what is written in the
Hebrew Tana”kh.

What are your comments?

Take care!

All the best!
Anders Branderud

Posted in Prophets | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment